Skip to main content Scroll Top

News

Moldovan electoral context and digital influence: between surprises and questions

This text was published by FACT, one of fifteen EDMO Hubs.

This content has been automatically translated to English using machine translation. As such, the translation may not be perfect and may contain errors or nuances that differ from the original text.
For the most accurate information, please refer to the original version.

This text was published by FACT, one of fifteen EDMO Hubs.

Author: Madalina Voina Credits: CONTEXT, PROMPT Following elections in Moldova, we see surprise reactions in public space related to the apparent performance of Vasile Costiuc’s Home Democracy Party – a party in polls placed below the 5% parliamentary threshold in Moldova, somewhere between 1.8-3%. We recall the small but efficient infrastructure identified for Vasile Costiuc from August 2025 on TikTok: 16 million views and 422,000 follow-up and 31.000 distributions from August 1st to September 28th. Let us remember that we are talking about a country with 2.3 million citizens and that the way the TikTok platform calculates these figures is unclear, at least in terms of the equation a view = a play count. We don’t believe in unique causes that influence elections. The electoral result is always the product of a multitude of interconnected factors, not a single campaign on TikTok. But we think it’s important to remember one of the factors that is increasingly affecting the integrity of elections: online electoral campaigns. In this respect, accounts under the pseudonym, some with a high level of 1 defined as identical / similar videos, with the same messages, which share their followers with suspects themselves (empty accounts,…

Read the full article here ❯